Reviews


A narrative review on contouring the chin and lower jawline with filler injections

Keywords | Summary | Correspondence | References


Keywords

, , , ,

Schlüsselworte

Summary

The lower third of the face plays an important role in facial ageing. Changes in the ligaments and retinaculae cutis, the dermal connective tissue and the fat compartments lead to the formation of so-called sagging cheeks and to aesthetically disturbing modifications of the chin region. The anatomical basis and general information on filler injections are supplemented by an overview of published filler studies. Safety aspects and limitations of the studies are discussed.

Zusammenfassung


Introduction

The lower third of the face cannot be ignored as part of the facial ageing process. The following factors play a decisive role:

 

  1. Sagging of the skin and connective tissue in the cheek area and perioral region.
  2. Malar fat tissue reduction.
  3. The resorption of bone in the upper and lower jaw.
  4. The position of the teeth, possible tooth loss, dentures.

 

As a result of these processes, there is a successive reduction in the definition of the mandibular line (jowls) and surface irregularities of the chin region such as dimpled chin and chin ptosis, perioral radial wrinkles and emphasis of the mandibular crease. In this review, we focus on the chin and mandibular line. With regard to dynamic perioral wrinkles, please refer to the reviews [1-3].

 

Material and methods

A literature search of the years 2010-2024 was conducted via PUBMED. Inclusion criteria were:

 

  1. Studies in English or German;
  2. Information on fillers and injection techniques;
  3. Performed on healthy adults;
  4. Data access.

 

Exclusion criteria were:

Studies on fillers in other indications and outside the lower third of the face.

The search was carried out using the following keywords: “Filler”, “Face”, “Aging”, “Esthetics”, “Jawline”, “Chin”, “Marionette Lines” and “Trial”. “Filler AND Trial” yielded 1008 studies, “Filler AND Face AND Trial” yielded 362 hits. “Filler AND Face AND Trial AND Esthetics” yielded 215 studies, “Filler AND Jawline” yielded 71 studies and “Filler AND Chin” yielded 123 studies. “Filler trial AND Chin” yielded 12 studies, “Filler trail AND Marionette lines” 11 and “Filler trial AND Jawline” 6 publications.

 

Anatomy and aging

Jowls (“sagging cheeks”): There are various hypotheses regarding their origin. Mendelson et al. described the jowls as changes in the sub-platysmal, deep tissue layer [4]. In contrast, Reece & Rohrich assumed a supra-platysmal location [5]. More recent studies by Minelli et al. (2023) were able to confirm that the jowls are supra-platysmal [6].

 

The area in which the jowls develop are zones of maximum sliding of the subcutaneous tissue layers over the musculature during mandibular movements. The retinacula cutis, which connect the skin to the muscles above the mandibular ligaments, are significantly longer than in other supra-platysmal areas. With increasing age, the connective tissue fibers lose elasticity and become longer.

 

The age-related changes take place in several stages:

 

  1. In patients with thin skin and minimal jowl formation, there is atrophy of the subcutaneous fatty tissue.
  2. Cheek ptosis with normal skin, loss of the submalar depression and tissue fullness in the midface is caused by caudal displacement of fatty tissue compartments.
  3. Cascading, confluent fatty tissue over the mandible is caused by septal dehiscence.

 

There are 3 retaining ligaments on the chin according to Kang et al. (2016) (Fig. 1). They are located in the sub-platysmal layer:

Fig. 1: Mandibular anatomy. Bony structures and attachments of the ligaments (L.) modified after Kang et al. (2016). ( Partyna, modified by Apatanis Zandikaulis, Wikimedia Commons).

 

  1. The mental ligament lies ca. 9 mm lateral to the midline and 8.4 mm above the lower edge of the mandible.
  2. The medial mandibular ligament, which is located almost 29 mm lateral to the midline and slightly more than 8 mm superior to the lower edge of the mandible.
  3. The mandibular osteocutaneous ligament, more than 50 mm lateral to the midline and approximately 9 mm above the lower edge of the mandible [7].

 

According to recent anatomical studies, the mandibular ligament lies posterior to the jowl formation. The maximum caudal extension of the jowls is positioned over the posterior border of the medial mandibular ligament. The ligaments are not directly involved in the anterior and posterior borders of the jowls [6].

 

Mandibular fold: The labiomental or mandibular fold (“marionette line”) is formed by direct insertion of fibers of the orbicularis oris muscle and the “tectonic” transition zone of the SMAS (superficial musculoaponeurotic system) from type I (cheek) to type II (lips).

 

SMAS type I consists of parallel fibrous septa that connect the mimic musculature with the skin, while type II has stronger fasciae and smaller fatty tissue components [8]. The genesis of the mandibular fold is thus analogous to the nasolabial fold [6].

 

The mental fold is located between the lower lip and the prominence of the chin. It is created by contraction of the mentalis muscle [9].

 

The chin derives its shape from the bony structures, especially the symphysis, and the overlying soft tissue. Three-dimensional tomography and cadaver dissections indicate a significantly stronger vascularization of the superficial soft tissues than the deep parts [10]. This is important for esthetic filler injections.

 

Chin ptosis is caused by displacement of soft tissue from the symphysis of the mandible over the caudal edge of the mandible [11]. It can be dynamic, i.e. caused by muscular activity. These patients have a horizontal smile.

 

In “illusory chin ptosis”, the lip position and the intraoral sulcus are normal, as are the mimic movements. This type is caused by a pronounced submental crease, which can also sometimes exceed the lower edge of the mandible towards the head. Smiling does not change the perceived “ptosis”. In addition, there are variants that occur due to morphogenetic disorders or postoperatively. These changes are primarily corrected surgically and will therefore not be considered further here [12].

 

Dimpled chin is caused by contractions of the mentalis muscle and occurs as a dynamic phenomenon, particularly during speech [13]. Because of this mimic component, treatment with botulinum toxin is a priority [2].

 

Subcutaneous fatty tissue: Subcutaneous fatty tissue is involved in the development of the jowls and the mandibular fold. This is not present as a uniform layer but is structured in various compartments with stratification into deep and superficial parts.

 

Regarding the jowls, the lateral-temporal cheek compartment, the middle cheek compartment, the labiomandibular compartment and the jowl compartment under the middle cheek compartment are of interest. The labiomandibular compartment plays the dominant role in mandibular folds. For the dimpled chin, the chin compartment is of interest [14]. The structural and pathophysiological changes of the subcutaneous adipose tissue are of great relevance for the aging process of the face [15].

 

Filler for aesthetic application in the lower third of the face

In the following, we provide an overview of the published studies on filler treatment of the jowls, chin and mental folds, which are of outstanding importance for the aesthetics of the lower third of the face. For labiomental wrinkle treatment and correction of the dimpled chin, please refer to these publications [1, 16, 17].

 

For a safe injection technique, it is essential to consider the vascular anatomy of this region. The submental artery and the facial artery as well as the accompanying veins are the main vessels in this region. The submental artery originates from the facial artery. It can anastomose with the mental artery, which arises from a branch of the maxillary artery. The submental artery can communicate with the inferior labial artery [18].

Fig. 2: Aesthetic filler treatment of the prejowl region with HA filler in a 65-year-old woman. Creation of the V-aspect in the frontal view by deep injection along the mandible anteriorly and correction of the mandibular fold with retrograde filler application. Above untreated, below immediately after injection.

 

Posterior to the junction of the facial artery and vein from the neck over the mandible, the subcutaneous and supraperiosteal loge should be preferred for filler injections.

When selecting fillers, it is important to bear in mind that skin tightening effects are based on different effects. While hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers achieve a tightening effect primarily through volume, bioactive fillers such as poly-L-lactic acid and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) are capable to change the connective tissue structure. However, this requires a comparatively longer time than the increase in volume using HA. The use of permanent fillers is not recommended, as severe side effects have been observed, sometimes with a delay of years. These usually result in surgical procedures to remove the filler material [19-23]. In the chin area, fillers with a high G* (gel strength or deformation resistance) and low Tan δ (phase angle, a relative measure of the viscous and elastic filler qualities) are recommended. Tan δ is the quotient of G” (viscous modulus) and G’ (elastic modulus).

 

The rheological properties of CaHA can be adjusted by appropriate dilutions. Higher dilutions reduce the gel strength (G* and G”) and increase Tan δ and thus the viscosity [24].

 

Filler studies for contouring the lower jawline

Table 1 provides information on study results after filler injection subcutaneously or supraperiosteally [25-34], both sharp and blunt needles were used. The injected volumes were between 1.2 and 4 ml. Most authors prefer a retrograde injection technique, some use the fanning or multilayered technique.

Some of the authors treated only young patients, in whom aging processes in the lower third of the face are likely to be present only slightly, if at all [32].

 

Only one study focused on patients >50 years of age [33]. This highlights a general problem of studies in aesthetic medicine – the focus on youth and the exclusion of advanced age.

If the sagging cheeks are less pronounced, filler injections in the midface can also help to improve the lower jawline and should be performed first [35, 36].

Table 2 provides an overview of the fillers used.

 

Filler for contouring the chin and treating mental wrinkles

The injection point for the prejowl region is lateral to the paramedian retraction at the edge of the mandible. The filler is injected retrogradely submuscularly and/or subcutaneously (Fig. 2). The mental fold is often also treated by injecting hyaluronic acid fillers, which are injected subcutaneously [37].

 

The 3-point chin technique for shaping the chin goes back to Adel. All injection points are located along the midline. The first injection point is at the mental crease. The second injection point is at the pogonion (the most anterior part of the chin) and the third injection point is at the menton (the inferior point of the chin). In a first step, a microbulus of hyaluronic acid filler is placed at these 3 points, followed by superficial retrograde linear injections [38].

 

Table 3 provides an overview of the filler studies [38-40].

Filler for the treatment of marionette lines (mandibular fold)

In terms of the complex treatment of the lower third of the face, the mandibular folds should not be neglected. Hyaluronic acid fillers are predominantly used here, although case reports and retrospective studies for CaHA are also available [32, 41-45]. Linear retrograde injection was predominantly used, with microdroplet or fanning techniques employed less frequently. The filler volume used was mostly 1 ml.

Safety aspects

In a systematic review, Ou et al. (2024) evaluated 917 patients with chin treatment. The most common side effects were at the injection site: swelling, bruising, pain, redness, pruritus. Only 2 more serious hub effects were observed, but no vascular complications (46). Other authors have observed tongue necrosis as a rare and serious complication [47].

 

Summary

Filler injections have been established as non-surgical versatile tools to correct age-related changes in the aesthetics of the lower third of the face. Biostimulatory fillers such as CaHA are used for the jawline while hyaluronic acid fillers are preferred for the chin. However, permanent fillers should not be used due to safety concerns [22, 23]. There are some possible combinations with microfocused ultrasound, injection lipolysis and neuromodulators, which allow an individualized treatment [48]. There are also other treatment options such as lipotransfer and surgical techniques [49, 50].

 

The advantage of minimally invasive correction with fillers are the short downtime for the patient and the manageable costs. The disadvantage is the limited duration of the effect. However, surgical measures cannot be replaced by fillers in cases of pronounced cheek ptosis and chin deformities.

Address of Correspondence

Prof. Dr. Uwe Wollina
Former Head of Department of Dermatology and Allergology
Dresden Municipal Hospital – Academic Teaching Hospital
Friedrichstrasse 41
DE-01067 Dresden
Email: uwollina@gmail.com

Conflict of Interests

None.

References

1. Wollina U. Perioral rejuvenation: restoration of attractiveness in aging females by minimally invasive procedures. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1149-1155.
2. Gauglitz G, Imhof M, Podda M, Beck-Broichsitter B, Gassner H, Kauder O, Kleinschmidt L, Vent J, Sommer B. S1-Leitlinie: Ästhetische Botulinumtoxin-Therapie. https://register.awmf.org/assets/guidelines/013-077l_S1_Aesthetische_Botulinumtoxin_Therapie_2022-07.pdf.
3. Quereshy FA, Schieder GF 4th. Perioral filler augmentation. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2024;32(1):23-33.
4. Mendelson BC, Freeman ME, Wu W, Huggins RJ. Surgical anatomy of the lower face: the premasseter space, the jowl, and the labiomandibular fold. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(2):185-195.
5. Reece EM, Rohrich RJ. The aesthetic jaw line: management of the aging jowl. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28(6):668-74.
6. Minelli L, Yang HM, van der Lei B, Mendelson B. The surgical anatomy of the jowl and the mandibular ligament reassessed. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(1):170-180
. 7. Kang MS, Kang HG, Nam YS, Kim IB. Detailed anatomy of the retaining ligaments of the mandible for facial rejuvenation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(9):1126-1130.
8. Sandulescu T, Franzmann M, Jast J, Blaurock-Sandulescu T, Spilker L, Klein C, Naumova EA, Arnold WH. Facial fold and crease development: A new morphological approach and classification. Clin Anat. 2019;32(4):573-584.
9. Choi DY, Bae H, Bae JH, Kim HJ, Hu KS. Effective Locations for injecting botulinum toxin into the mentalis muscle; cadaveric and ultrasonographic study. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(2):96.
10. Li XR, Hong WJ, Li ZH, Luo CE, Jiang XY, Luo SK. Clinical anatomy of the chin evaluated by 3-dimensional tomography and cadaveric dissection: implications for safety and optimal injection techniques in Chinese. Dermatol Surg. 2023;49(3):237-241.
11. Torrealba R, Fariña R, Valladares S, Sáez F. Correction of chin ptosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(8):1026-1029.
12. Garfein ES, Zide BM. Chin ptosis: classification, anatomy, and correction. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2008;1(1):1-14
. 13. Kane MA. The functional anatomy of the lower face as it applies to rejuvenation via chemodenervation. Facial Plast Surg. 2005;21(1):55-64.
14. Pils U, Anderhuber F. Anatomie des Gesichts. Grundlagen für ästhetische Anwendungen. Berlin: Gmc – Gesundheitsmedien und Congress GmbH 2019.
15. Wollina U, Wetzker R, Abdel-Naser MB, Kruglikov IL. Role of adipose tissue in facial aging. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:2069-2076.
16. Ascher B, Rzany BJ, Kestemont P, Redaelli A, Hendrickx B, Iozzo I, Martschin C, Milotich A, Molina B, Cartier H, Picaut P, Prygova I. International consensus recommendations on the aesthetic usage of ready-to-use abobotulinumtoxina (Alluzience). Aesthet Surg J. 2024;44(2):192-202.
17. Suryadevara AC. Update on perioral cosmetic enhancement. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;16(4):347-351. 18. Wollina U, Goldman A. Facial vascular danger zones for filler injections. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e14285.
19. Wollina U, Goldman A. Hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: Safety and efficacy for the treatment of wrinkles, aging skin, body sculpturing and medical conditions. Clin Med Rev Ther. 2011;3:107-121.
20. Breithaupt A, Fitzgerald R. Collagen stimulators: Poly-L-lactic acid and calcium hydroxyl apatite. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015;23(4):459-469.
21. Barone M, De Bernardis R, Persichetti P. Permanent facial fillers: addressing complications and advancing solutions. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04104-z. Epub ahead of print.
22. Goldman A, Staub H, Wollina U. Hypercalcemia due to polymethylmethacrylate injections? (Literature review and case reports). Georgian Med News. 2018;(282):17-20.
23. McCarthy AD, Soares DJ, Chandawarkar A, El-Banna R, de Lima Faria GE, Hagedorn N. Comparative rheology of hyaluronic acid fillers, poly-l-lactic acid, and varying dilutions of calcium hydroxylapatite. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(8):e6068.
24. Burgess C, Dayan S, Bank D, Weinkle S, Sartor M, Chawla S, Keaney T. Hyaluronic acid filler VYC-25L for jawline restoration yields high satisfaction, improved jawline measurements, and sustained effectiveness across skin types, age, and gender for up to 12 months. Aesthet Surg J. 2024:sjae172. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae172. Epub ahead of print.
25. Green JB, Del Campo R, Durkin AJ, Funt DK, Nasrallah N, Martinez K, Moradi A. Long-term duration and safety of Radiesse (+) for the treatment of jawline. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024; doi: 10.1111/jocd.16436. Epub ahead of print.
26. Braccini F, Fanian F, Garcia P, Delmar H, Loreto F, Benadiba L, Nadra K, Kestemont P. Comparative clinical study for the efficacy and safety of two different hyaluronic acid-based fillers with Tri-Hyal versus Vycross technology: A long-term prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(2):473-485.
27. Boen M, Alhaddad M, Goldman MP, Kollipara R, Hoss E, Wu DC. A Randomized, evaluator-blind, split-face study evaluating the safety and efficacy of calcium hydroxylapatite for jawline augmentation. Dermatol Surg. 2022;48(1):76-81.
28. Fakih-Gomez N, Kadouch J. combining calcium hydroxylapatite and hyaluronic acid fillers for aesthetic indications: efficacy of an innovative hybrid filler. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;46(1):373-381.
29. Müller D, Prinz V, Sulovsky M, Cajkovsky M, Moellhoff N, Cotofana S, Frank K. Longevity and subject-reported satisfaction after minimally invasive jawline contouring. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(1):199-206.
30. Moradi A, Green J, Cohen J, Joseph J, Dakovic R, Odena G, Verma A, Scher R. Effectiveness and safety of calcium hydroxylapatite with lidocaine for improving jawline contour. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(11):1231-1238.
31. Bertossi D, Robiony M, Lazzarotto A, Giampaoli G, Nocini R, Nocini PF. Nonsurgical redefinition of the chin and jawline of younger adults with a hyaluronic acid filler: results evaluated with a grid system approach. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(9):1068-1076.
32. Yutskovskaya YA, Sergeeva AD, Kogan EA. Combination of calcium hydroxylapatite diluted with normal saline and microfocused ultrasound with visualization for skin tightening. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(4):405-411.
33. Wollina U, Goldman A. Minimal invasive chin and jawline improvement in women in the second half of their life. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(3):e13320.
34. Ogilvie P, Benouaiche L, Philipp-Dormston WG, Belhaouari L, Gaymans F, Sattler G, Harvey C, Schumacher A. VYC-25L hyaluronic acid injectable gel is safe and effective for long-term restoration and creation of volume of the lower face. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(9):NP499-NP510.
35. Casabona G, Frank K, Moellhoff N, Gavril DL, Swift A, Freytag DL, Kaiser A, Green JB, Nikolis A, Cotofana S. Full-face effects of temporal volumizing and temporal lifting techniques. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(11):2830-2837.
36. Wollina U. Facial rejuvenation starts in the midface: three-dimensional volumetric facial rejuvenation has beneficial effects on nontreated neighboring esthetic units. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(1):82-88.
37. Braz A, Eduardo CCP. Reshaping the lower face using injectable fillers. Indian J Plast Surg. 2020;53(2):207-218.
38. Adel N. The three-points chin: a multilayered filler approach using a cannula. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(5):e5772.
39. Nikolis A, Humphrey S, Rivers JK, Bertucci V, Solish N, McGillivray W, Bailey K, Rosen N, Metelitsa A, Rugheimer A, Weinberg F, Prygova I, Bromee T. Effectiveness and safety of a new hyaluronic acid injectable for augmentation and correction of chin retrusion. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):255-261.
40. Xie Y, Zhao H, Wu W, Xu J, Li B, Wu S, Chen K, Bromée T, Li Q. Chin augmentation and treatment of chin retrusion with a flexible hyaluronic acid filler in Asian subjects: a randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;48(5):1030-1036.
41. Ehlinger-David A, Gorj M, Braccini F, Loreto F, Grand-Vincent A, Garcia P, Taieb M, Benadiba L, Catoni I, Mathey ER, Deutsch JJ, Bahadoran P, Vincent T, David M, Cartier H, Nadra K, Moellhoff N, Fanian F. A prospective multicenter clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid-based filler with Tri-Hyal technology in the treatment of lips and the perioral area. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(2):464-472.
42. Wollina U, Goldman A. Long lasting facial rejuvenation by repeated placement of calcium hydroxylapatite in elderly women. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e14183.
43. Solish N, Bertucci V, Percec I, Wagner T, Nogueira A, Mashburn J. Dynamics of hyaluronic acid fillers formulated to maintain natural facial expression. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(3):738-746.
44. Brandt F, Bassichis B, Bassichis M, O'Connell C, Lin X. Safety and effectiveness of small and large gel-particle hyaluronic acid in the correction of perioral wrinkles. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011;10(9):982-987.
45. Guida S, Galadari H. A systematic review of Radiesse/calcium hydroxylapatite and carboxymethylcellulose: evidence and recommendations for treatment of the face. Int J Dermatol. 2024;63(2):150-160.
46. Ou Y, Wu M, Liu D, Luo L, Xu X, He J, Long Y, Feng J, Nian M, Cui Y. Nonsurgical chin augmentation using hyaluronic acid: a systematic review of technique, satisfaction, and complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(4):1560-1567.
47. Thanasarnaksorn W, Thanyavuthi A, Prasertvit P, Rattanakuntee S, Jitaree B, Suwanchinda A. Case series of tongue necrosis from vascular complications after chin augmentation with hyaluronic acid: Potential pathophysiology and management. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(3):784-791.
48. Go BC, Frost AS, Friedman O. Using injectable fillers for chin and jawline rejuvenation. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;9(2):131-137.
49. Pokrowiecki R, Šufliarsky B, Jagielak M. Esthetic surgery of the chin in cis- and transgender patients-application of t-genioplasty vs. single-piece segment lateralization. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(1):139.
50. Oranges CM, Grufman V, di Summa PG, Fritsche E, Kalbermatten DF. Chin augmentation techniques: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;151(5): 758e-771e.

Issue